Free · 2 minutes · no sign-up to start

Is your research built for AI agents?

AI agents increasingly read, cite, and act on the web — but most sites were built only for humans with a cursor. Drop in your URL for an instant, automated score across the signals agents rely on — and the specific fix for each gap.

We fetch your public homepage, /llms.txt, /robots.txt and /sitemap.xml. Instant · free · no sign-up to see your score.

Prefer a quick self-assessment?

No URL handy, or scoring research rather than a site? Answer 8 questions instead.

Machine-readable formats

1 / 8 · Machine-readable formats

Is your research available as clean, structured text an AI can parse — not just PDFs, slides, or images?

Discovery files

2 / 8 · Discovery files

Do you publish an llms.txt, a sitemap, or agents.json so AI agents can find your content?

Structured metadata

3 / 8 · Structured metadata

Do your pages carry structured metadata (JSON-LD / schema.org) describing authors, dates, and claims?

Programmatic access

4 / 8 · Programmatic access

Can an agent pull your research through an API or feed, rather than scraping a web page?

Citability

5 / 8 · Citability

Is each piece uniquely addressable and citable — stable URLs, clear IDs, visible provenance?

Crawl permissions

6 / 8 · Crawl permissions

Does your robots.txt / AI-meta actually allow reputable AI crawlers, rather than blocking them?

Trust signals

7 / 8 · Trust signals

Can an agent assess how rigorous your research is — visible methodology, sources, validation?

Freshness signals

8 / 8 · Freshness signals

Do you expose update signals (feeds, changelogs, last-updated dates) so agents know when content changes?

Want us to fix the gaps for you?

The score is the proof. We'll make your research findable, trusted, and citable by the agents that read it — done for you, fixed-price.

See Agent-Readiness (done for you) →